1 Psychology and human development1.11 Underlying concepts in human development
1.11.5 Neuroimaging and its role in understanding development
3 min read2 figures
Written by Resident Doctor Committee · Published
What each modality measures
Modality | What it measures | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|
Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | Volume, cortical thickness, surface area | Does not measure cells; movement and scanner differences |
Diffusion MRI | Water diffusion (anisotropy, diffusivity); tractography | Not a direct myelin measure; crossing fibres |
Functional MRI | Blood oxygen level dependent signal, task or resting | Indirect; movement and task performance confound |
Positron emission tomography (PET) | Metabolism, blood flow or molecular binding | Radiotracer exposure limits research in healthy children |
MRI dominates developmental research because it uses no ionising radiation, so children can be scanned repeatedly.
Study designs
Cross-sectional studies compare age groups once; they are quick but confound age with cohort and individual differences.
Longitudinal studies rescan the same people and show that development varies between individuals and is often non-linear.
Longitudinal studies suffer attrition, scanner changes, practice effects and measurement error.
Shape of brain development
Brain volume is about a quarter of adult size at birth, three quarters by age two and 90 to 95% by about six.
Later, white matter volume increases while many cortical grey matter measures decline.
Synaptogenesis peaks earlier in visual than in prefrontal cortex.
Sensory and motor systems mature before association regions, which go on changing into adulthood.
Timing varies by region, measure and person, so no scan places an individual on a universal maturity scale.
Cortical thinning
MRI measures thickness between tissue contrast boundaries, so it does not directly measure synaptic pruning.
Apparent thinning can reflect changes in synapses, dendrites, glia, water, folding or analysis method.
Increasing myelination can shift the grey-white matter boundary without any tissue loss.
White matter and networks
White matter develops into early adulthood, including long-range frontal connections.
Rising fractional anisotropy and falling diffusivity may reflect myelination and axonal organisation, but fibre geometry also affects both.
Functional networks become more differentiated from one another and more integrated internally.
Head movement can mimic the reported childhood pattern of stronger short-range and weaker long-range connectivity.
Adolescence
Dual systems accounts propose that reward responses and cognitive control mature on different schedules, contributing to context-dependent risk-taking.
Adolescents may reason about risk like adults when calm, yet behave differently under arousal or peer influence.
Group findings cannot establish an individual young person's maturity, intent or capacity for control.
Ageing
HAROLD (hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults) describes more bilateral recruitment.
The posterior-anterior shift in ageing describes greater frontal than posterior recruitment.
Account | Claim | Supporting finding |
|---|---|---|
Compensation (scaffolding) | Extra recruitment helps performance | More recruitment with better performance |
Dedifferentiation | Activity becomes less specialised | Broader activation with poorer performance |
Both accounts may apply in different tasks.
Interpreting findings
Group-level brain-behaviour associations do not show direction, because experience changes the brain and shared causes affect both.
Reverse inference wrongly concludes that a process occurred because a region linked to it activated; most regions serve several functions.
Limitation | Consequence |
|---|---|
Participant movement | Correlates with age or symptoms, creating bias |
Selected samples | Children who tolerate scanning may not represent clinical populations |
Multiple comparisons | Inadequate correction produces false positives |
Small studies | Overestimate effects and fail to replicate |
Group to individual inference | Overlapping distributions limit individual conclusions |
Research scans cannot determine maturity, verify symptoms or diagnose most psychiatric disorders.
Clinical imaging answers specific questions, such as suspected lesions, malformations, hydrocephalus or neurological disease.