1 Psychology and human development1.12 Stages of human development
1.12.2 Bowlby attachment theory
10 min read2 figures
Written by Resident Doctor Committee · Published
Bowlby's evolutionary account
Attachment is a lasting bond with a caregiver who gives comfort in distress and a secure base for exploration.
Bowlby held that the human infant is born helpless and needs a caregiver to survive, so attachment behaviour is an evolved, adaptive system for protection.
Attachment is driven by an innate need for proximity and security, not by feeding: Bowlby rejected the secondary-drive or "cupboard love" account.
Distress, pain, illness, fatigue, unfamiliarity and separation switch the system on, and comfort settles it.
A frightened child stops exploring, and a child who feels secure explores.
Children stay attached to caregivers who maltreat them, so attachment does not show that care is safe.
Behaviour | What the child does |
|---|---|
Proximity seeking | Keeps close to the carer as a matter of course; the core attachment behaviour Bowlby described |
Safe haven | Goes to the carer for comfort when frightened or in pain |
Secure base | Explores away from the carer and checks back cheerfully |
Evidence from animals
Harlow's surrogate mother experiments in infant rhesus monkeys showed that contact comfort, not feeding, is the basis of the bond: infants clung to the soft cloth surrogate even when only the wire surrogate gave milk.
Imprinting, described by Lorenz in goslings and drawn on by Bowlby, is rapid learning in a critical period after hatching, in which the young animal comes to follow the first moving object it meets.
Feature | Imprinting | Human attachment |
|---|---|---|
How it develops | Rapidly, to the first moving object | Through repeated interaction over months |
Timing | Critical period, roughly 13 to 16 hours after hatching | Sensitive period |
Flexibility | Needs no reward; specific, largely irreversible and lifelong | Several attachment figures possible |
Monotropy and multiple attachments
The principal attachment figure is defined by consistent, responsive care, not by kinship or sex, so it may be a father, grandparent or other carer rather than the biological mother.
Monotropy is Bowlby's term for the infant's innate bias towards one principal attachment figure, ranked above the subsidiary attachments to other carers and different in kind from them.
Polytropy is attachment spread across a network of several caregivers, each of whom the child misses when they leave and each of whom can soothe the child.
By about 18 months most infants are attached to more than one familiar figure: in Schaffer and Emerson's study about 87% had multiple attachments and about 13% only one.
Attachment describes a relationship, so a child can be secure with one caregiver and insecure with another.
Phases of attachment development
Bowlby's four phases are told apart by whether the child discriminates familiar people, protests at separation and takes account of the caregiver's plans.
Phase | Approximate age | Behaviour |
|---|---|---|
Pre-attachment | Birth to 6 to 8 weeks | Signals to and orients towards people but responds to every adult alike |
Attachment in the making | 6 to 8 weeks to 6 to 8 months | Directs smiles and babbling at familiar people but accepts strangers and does not protest at separation |
Clear-cut attachment | 6 to 8 months to 18 to 24 months | Shows separation protest, following, secure base use and wariness of strangers |
Goal-corrected partnership | From 18 to 24 months (around 2 to 3 years) | Grasps that the caregiver has plans of their own, accepts an explained absence and negotiates around it |
The boundary between the first two phases is also given as 8 to 12 weeks, or 2 months.
A specific attachment to one figure, shown by stranger wariness and separation protest, first appears at about 7 to 9 months; clear-cut attachment is clearest after 7 months.
Attachment behaviours peak at about 6 to 18 months.
The sensitive period for forming a first selective attachment runs from about 6 to 24 months, matching the clear-cut phase.
These ages are guides, not diagnostic cut-offs.
The social smile first appears at about 6 to 8 weeks, after the earlier reflex smile and before laughing aloud at 3 to 4 months; its absence by 8 weeks is a red flag needing assessment.
Stranger and separation anxiety
Phenomenon | Trigger | Onset | Peak | Usually settles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Stranger anxiety | An unfamiliar person | 6 to 9 months | 12 to 18 months | Fades after about 3 years |
Separation anxiety | The attachment figure leaving | 6 to 8 months | 10 to 18 months | By about 3 years |
Stranger anxiety starts once the infant can tell familiar from unfamiliar faces.
Concept | Stage | Description |
|---|---|---|
Object constancy (Mahler) | Consolidates in the third year | A stable inner image of the parent that comforts the child and lets a long separation be tolerated |
Castration anxiety | Oedipal stage, 3 to 5 years | The boy's fear of bodily retaliation from his rival father |
Superego anxiety | Latency | Fear that the internalised parental authority will punish or withdraw love; the most mature developmental anxiety |
Internal working models
The internal working model is Bowlby's construct: paired representations of whether others will be available and whether the self is worthy of care, built from real caregiving experience.
Expected comfort encourages direct signals of distress, expected rejection encourages suppression, and inconsistent responses encourage stronger signals.
These models often work outside awareness, and later relationships, including therapy, can change them.
Attachment behaviour persists across the lifespan into adult and therapeutic relationships, less intense after early childhood but never extinguished, carried forward by internal working models.
Ainsworth's sensitivity, noticing a child's signal, understanding it and responding promptly and appropriately, is moderately associated with security; video feedback that improves it can improve security.
The Strange Situation
Mary Ainsworth devised the Strange Situation, the standard laboratory assessment of infant attachment; Bowlby built the theory it tests.
It was designed and validated for infants of about 12 to 18 months, when separation protest, stranger wariness and exploration are reliably present.
Its eight short episodes include two separations and two reunions.
Classification rests mainly on behaviour at the reunion episodes, especially the second, not at the separations.
Pattern | Behaviour | Associated care | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
Secure | Uses the caregiver as a secure base, protests at separation, seeks contact at reunion, is promptly comforted by the caregiver rather than the stranger and resumes play | Sensitive and available | Signals distress directly |
Insecure-avoidant (type A) | Protests little at separation, treats the stranger much like the parent, actively avoids or ignores the parent at reunion | Consistently rejects or fails to respond to bids for comfort | Suppresses distress signals |
Insecure-resistant (ambivalent) | Explores poorly, shows intense separation distress, mixes contact-seeking with angry resistance at reunion and does not settle | Inconsistent, unpredictably available | Amplifies distress signals |
Disorganised | Shows contradictory approach and avoidance, freezing, stilling, apprehension and stereotypies towards the caregiver at reunion | Maltreatment; a parent's unresolved loss or trauma | No coherent strategy |
Secure attachment is the majority in low-risk Western samples, at roughly 60 to 70%, about two in three infants.
Avoidant and resistant patterns are organised strategies, so an avoidant infant still has a bond; disorganisation is a breakdown of strategy.
Avoidant infants who look calm are physiologically aroused on heart rate measures.
Main and Solomon added disorganised attachment to Ainsworth's original three, giving four infant categories: secure, avoidant, resistant and disorganised.
Disorganisation is associated with maltreatment but does not prove that maltreatment occurred.
Culture changes Strange Situation behaviour and the proportions classed avoidant or resistant.
What a classification predicts
Insecurity is not a diagnosis: most insecure children develop no disorder, and links with later problems are modest and non-specific.
Insecure attachment in early childhood is a risk factor for school-age behavioural problems, most often oppositional defiant disorder.
Insecure-avoidant attachment in infancy is linked to later perpetrating bullying, through negative working models of others, poor emotion regulation and hostile social information processing.
Disorganisation is associated with externalising problems and dissociation.
Adult Attachment Interview
The Adult Attachment Interview (AAI), by George, Kaplan and Main, classifies an adult's current state of mind about attachment from the coherence, content and language of their account of childhood, not from security with any one person. A mother's AAI category corresponds with her infant's Strange Situation classification.
AAI category | How the speaker talks | Infant's Strange Situation class |
|---|---|---|
Autonomous | Coherent and balanced, backing descriptions with memories | Secure |
Dismissing | Idealises without supporting memories, recalls little, minimises and stresses self-sufficiency | Avoidant |
Preoccupied (entangled) | Long-winded, angry and still caught up in early relationships | Resistant (ambivalent) |
Unresolved (disorganised) | Shows lapses in reasoning or discourse when talking of loss or abuse | Disorganised |
A speaker coded unresolved is also given the best-fitting organised category.
Earned security is a harsh childhood coded autonomous because the account is coherent and reflective, often after supportive later relationships.
Continuity of attachment from infancy into adulthood is moderate.
Separation
Robertson and Bowlby described a young child's response to prolonged separation from the attachment figure in three phases.
Phase | Presentation |
|---|---|
Protest | Crying, searching, calling and rejecting others' comfort |
Despair | Quiet, withdrawn and grieving; sometimes mistaken for settling |
Detachment | Apparent recovery, then indifference or hostility at reunion |
Anaclitic depression is Spitz's description of depressive withdrawal with physical decline in an attached infant over about 6 months old who suddenly loses the attachment figure; it reverses on reunion.
Familiar, responsive substitute care, prior security and a good reunion lessen the impact; repeated changes of caregiver do most harm.
Deprivation and privation
Deprivation between about 6 months and 3 years, when selective attachments form, carries lasting risk that later good care may not reverse, whereas the same deprivation ending earlier does not.
Bowlby's maternal deprivation hypothesis treated all separation from the mother as one experience and overstated its lasting harm.
Rutter separated the two experiences:
Term | Meaning | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
Deprivation | Loss or disruption of a bond already formed | Less severe |
Privation | An attachment bond never formed | Affectionless, antisocial and intellectually delayed |
Institutional care and adoption
The Bucharest Early Intervention Project is the only randomised trial of family foster care against continued institutional care for abandoned children; developmental gains were larger the earlier the placement, and benefit was real but partial.
Hodges and Tizard followed children raised in London residential nurseries: the ex-institutional syndrome of problematic peer relatedness persisted at age 16, even when adoption produced good family attachments.
In children adopted after early adversity, security recovers after placement, but pre-adoptive adversity leaves a lasting mark on attachment representations.
Attachment disorders
Both disorders follow grossly inadequate early care, need a developmental age of at least 9 months, and are distinct from insecure attachment.
Reactive attachment disorder | Disinhibited social engagement disorder | |
|---|---|---|
Main features | Rarely seeks or accepts comfort when distressed | Indiscriminate, overly familiar behaviour towards unfamiliar adults; willing to leave with them |
Other features | Limited social responsiveness; unexplained sadness, fear or irritability | No checking back with a familiar caregiver |
In the International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision (ICD-11), reactive attachment disorder cannot be diagnosed alongside autism spectrum disorder.
ICD-11 does not allow reactive attachment disorder before 12 months of age (developmental age under 9 months), and 5 years is the upper limit for onset.
Disinhibited social engagement can persist after a selective attachment forms.
Attachment and bonding
Attachment | Bonding | |
|---|---|---|
Direction | Infant's tie to the caregiver | Caregiver's tie to the infant |
Assessed from | Infant's separation and reunion behaviour | Parent's own account of their feelings |
Development | Across the first two years | Variable; may develop gradually |
The two can be discordant: strong parental love does not guarantee secure attachment, and delayed feelings do not predict insecurity.
There is no established critical bonding window just after birth, and a difficult birth or neonatal admission does not mean the bond is damaged.
Persistently absent feelings towards the baby warrant assessment for postnatal depression.