1 Psychology and human development1.12 Stages of human development
1.12.5 Temperament, character and personality
7 min read1 figure
Written by Resident Doctor Committee · Published
Individual temperamental differences
Temperament, character and personality
Temperament is the stylistic "how" of a child's behaviour, as distinct from its content (the "what") and its motivation (the "why").
Term | Meaning | When it appears |
|---|---|---|
Temperament | Early differences in reactivity, activity, attention and self-regulation | Infancy |
Character | Learned values, goals and standards; Cloninger's learned counterpart to temperament | Childhood and adolescence |
Personality | Enduring patterns of thinking, feeling and behaviour, combining both | Towards adulthood |
Temperament is biologically based, heritable (estimates of 20 to 60%) and moderately stable from early childhood into later life.
Persistence is temperament, while what a child persists at reflects character.
The New York Longitudinal Study
Thomas and Chess did the foundational work on temperament in the New York Longitudinal Study (NYLS), interviewing parents from the child's infancy. Their work is separate from the attachment research of Bowlby and Ainsworth.
Nine dimensions
Dimension | What it rates |
|---|---|
Activity level | Amount of movement |
Rhythmicity | Regularity of sleep, feeding and elimination |
Approach or withdrawal | Direction of the first reaction to something new |
Adaptability | How easily that first reaction is modified over later exposures |
Threshold | Stimulation needed to trigger a response |
Intensity | Strength of response |
Mood | Usual positive or negative emotional tone |
Distractibility | How easily an outside stimulus interrupts activity |
Attention span and persistence | How long activity lasts, including through obstacles |
Three clusters
Cluster | Features | Proportion |
|---|---|---|
Easy | Regular rhythms, approach to novelty, quick adaptation, mild or moderate intensity, mildly positive mood | About 40% |
Difficult | Irregular biological functions, withdrawal from novelty, slow adaptation, intense reactions, negative mood | About 10% |
Slow to warm up | Withdraws at first, adapts slowly with repeated unpressured contact, mild intensity, mildly negative mood | About 15% |
About 35% of children fitted none of the three clusters, so only about 65% were classified.
Irregularity marks the difficult child, so regular waking, eating and bowel habits rule this cluster out.
The slow-to-warm-up child differs from the difficult child in intensity: mild reactions rather than intense, fiery ones.
The clusters group continuous traits, and "difficult" describes a pattern, not a fixed outcome.
Goodness of fit
Goodness of fit is Thomas and Chess's idea that developmental outcome depends on the match between the child's temperament and the demands of the environment, not on either alone.
An active child may struggle with long seated tasks but manage with short tasks and movement breaks.
Other temperament models
Model | Dimensions | Points to remember |
|---|---|---|
Buss and Plomin (1975) | Emotionality, activity, sociability and impulsivity (EASI) | The later EAS model dropped impulsivity |
Rothbart | Surgency, negative affectivity, effortful control | Separates reactivity from self-regulation |
Kagan | Inhibited and uninhibited children | Inhibition shows as wariness, withdrawal and arousal in response to novelty |
Buss and Plomin's EAS temperaments appear early, are heritable, have an evolutionary basis and are stable into adulthood.
Behavioural inhibition in toddlers raises the risk of later anxiety disorder, especially social anxiety, but most inhibited children never develop one.
Later outcomes and developmental timing
Longer waiting in childhood delay-of-gratification tasks is associated with better later academic achievement and better social, behavioural and health outcomes.
Heterotypic continuity means psychopathology persists across development while its diagnostic form changes, so an earlier disorder predicts a different later one.
Homotypic continuity means the same diagnosis persists.
A sensitive period explains why the same adversity disrupts different developmental domains depending on the age at which it occurs.
Multifinality only names the finding that one exposure leads to divergent outcomes.
Personality
Basic terms
Personality is a relatively enduring, organised pattern of thinking, feeling and behaviour.
Term | What it is | Example |
|---|---|---|
Trait | An enduring disposition on a continuous dimension, present in everyone to some degree | Trait anxiety |
Type | A discrete category the person is assigned to | Type A personality |
State | A temporary condition at one moment | State anxiety |
Assess personality when the person is well, because current illness can resemble enduring traits.
History
Julius Koch introduced "psychopathic inferiority" in the early 1890s, an early forerunner of personality disorder.
Moral insanity was Prichard's term, and psychopathic personality was Schneider's, about three decades after Koch.
Nomothetic and idiographic approaches
Nomothetic | Idiographic | |
|---|---|---|
Focus | Attributes shared across people | The single individual in depth |
Aim | General laws (from nomos, law) | The organisation and meaning of one person |
Methods | Standard variables compared across people | Single cases, individually elicited constructs, person-specific dispositions |
Weakness | Explains the individual poorly | Generalises poorly |
Allport's trait theory
Gordon Allport founded trait theory and ranked traits at three levels.
Level | What it is |
|---|---|
Cardinal | A rare, single disposition that dominates almost all of a person's behaviour |
Central | Five to ten per person, broad and common, but not governing the whole life |
Secondary | Narrow and specific to context |
Eysenck's PEN model
Eysenck described three independent, biologically based, largely heritable dimensions: psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism.
Dimension | Basis or content |
|---|---|
Extraversion | Resting cortical arousal set by the ascending reticular activating system: low in extraverts, who seek stimulation, and high in introverts |
Neuroticism | Limbic and autonomic reactivity |
Psychoticism | Aggression, impulsivity and tough-mindedness, with weaker support |
The Eysenck Personality Inventory is a structured self-report questionnaire that measures extraversion-introversion and neuroticism-stability, plus a lie scale.
The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire adds psychoticism.
Five-factor model
The five-factor model (Big Five, OCEAN) of Costa and McCrae has five broad domains: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Narrower facets sit beneath each domain.
Psychoticism belongs to Eysenck's model and is not a Big Five domain; extraversion and neuroticism appear in both.
Score | What it looks like |
|---|---|
High neuroticism | Heightened emotional reactivity, intense negative emotion under stress, susceptibility to anxiety |
Low agreeableness | Scepticism about others' motives, argumentativeness and low sympathy, which strain trust and relationships |
Low conscientiousness | Poor organisation and follow-through (lost medication, missed tasks), which undermines adherence to a structured treatment plan |
A person high in both conscientiousness and agreeableness suits a structured, task-based therapy such as cognitive behavioural therapy, with its agenda and homework, rather than exploratory short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.
Behaviour-pattern types
Type | Core features | Health association |
|---|---|---|
A (Friedman and Rosenman) | Competition, time urgency, hostility | Hostility is the coronary-risk core |
B | Relaxed, unhurried, low stress reactivity | Lower coronary risk than Type A |
C | Compliant and conflict-avoiding; suppresses negative emotion, especially anger and sadness, to keep relationships harmonious | Weak proposed cancer link |
D, distressed (Denollet) | High negative affectivity together with high social inhibition | Poorer outcomes after myocardial infarction |
Negative affectivity is a broad inward tendency to worry, gloom and irritability, which is what separates Type D from the outward hostility of Type A.
Psychoanalytic ideas
In The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, Freud treated slips, forgetting and bungled actions (parapraxes) as expressions of unconscious material.
Freud's later dual-instinct theory sets the life instinct (Eros) against the death instinct (Thanatos).
Other approaches
Approach | Main idea |
|---|---|
Kelly's personal construct theory | People interpret experience through bipolar personal constructs, elicited with the repertory grid |
Cloninger | Temperament (novelty seeking, harm avoidance, reward dependence, persistence) is separate from developing character |
Social learning | Rotter's locus of control and Bandura's self-efficacy shape effort and persistence |
Rogers (humanistic) | Incongruence between self-concept and experience produces anxiety |
Personality tests
Objective (quantitative) | Projective (qualitative) | |
|---|---|---|
Stimulus | Fixed items | An ambiguous stimulus |
Scoring | A scoring key and norms | The examiner interprets a free response |
Examples | MMPI, NEO Personality Inventory, Eysenck Personality Inventory | Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test |
Objective inventories
The MMPI is empirically keyed: items were kept because they separated diagnostic groups, whatever their content.
Its clinical scales are named after syndromes, such as psychopathic deviate and paranoia, and its validity scales detect faking good or bad.
The NEO Personality Inventory of Costa and McCrae measures the five-factor model, splitting each of the five domains into six facets.
Projective tests
The Rorschach test uses symmetrical, contentless inkblots scored for location, determinants such as colour and movement, and content.
The Rorschach is the least structured common test, allowing the widest range of responses.
In the Thematic Apperception Test, the person tells a story about each ambiguous picture of people, and motives, needs and conflicts are inferred from the themes.
Premorbid intelligence
The National Adult Reading Test estimates premorbid intelligence: irregular words cannot be sounded out, so reading them depends on earlier familiarity, which survives early dementia.